Na is a probalistic language. The more details you use when explaining an event, the more probable it is that the recipient understands you. This is not very different from typical languages (“a blue building” is more precise than “a building”), but the new thing in Na is that this guesswork is everywhere.
Optimally, Na should have its own alphabet. To aid in its spreading, a subset of the Latin alphabet has been chosen instead:
. A E I O B D F G K L N S T V
All of these letters are pronounced as “short sounds”, i.e. “A” is not pronounced as “AAY”, but just “AE”. This is the same for all wovels. There are two types of correct syllables: those of the form
With only 4 wovels and 10 consonants pronouncations can be very varied and still correct. According to the rules laid out above there are 40 different single-syllable words, 40^2 = 1,600 two-syllable words, 40^3 = 64,000 three-syllable words, 40^4 = 2,560,000 four-syllable words, etc. At ten syllables (an extreme case) there are 10,485,760,000,000,000 different 10-syllable words and a total number of 10,754,625,641,025,640 any-number-of-syllables-less-or-equal-to-10 words.
The author of this document is not very familiar with IPA, SAMPA, or any other phonetic alphabet.
Na wants to be a useful language somewhat usable by people. Na has been designed to be fairly global, but since the creator of Na is fluent only in Germanic languages (Danish and English), and because the Latin alphabet is used, Na is non-global. Nevertheless, it /wants/ to be global.
Na has no nouns, no verbs, no adjectives, no adverbiums, no pronouns, etc. In Na, the core of everything is a word more or less equivalent to the English word “existence”. This word is BA. All other words are based on this base word (in object oriented programming language terminology, this is equivalent to subclassing classes).
The groups at the first levels of heritance are:
TODO: Improve on groups.
These have been chosen not because of perfection, but because Na was designed for human beings (who are not perfect). Nevertheless, these groups should suffice for the time being.
Note: These groups are few on purpose. Many words fit into several groups. Groups are only good for basic things; more complex meanings do not have to be placed in any group.
Na uses a combination of numbers, identifiers and further subclassing to achieve (some) usability. In Na, what is written as one sentence in e.g. English, can often become more than one sentence. To make a statement in Na, one splits one’s sentence into Na sentences, the first ones consisting of definitions and assignments (named variables), and the final one consisting of everything put together in the right order. Often, the order does not matter, and the purpose of the final sentence is really just to point out what definitions you have chosen to use, and that you are done.
For example, to write “I see a table.” in Na, you first extract the objects (in Na, everything is an object) from the sentence. This gives us:
In Na, this is simplified further into:
The only two possible sense-making combinations using all the words would be to say “I see a table” or “The table sees me”. To stress that the first version is wanted, we first combine “I” and “to see”, which we then combine with a definition of “table, 1”. Finally, we throw the definitions together, so that people will understand that the sentence is over.
To specify “I”, we use one of the members from the identity (DE) group. “to see” is also an abstraction, because the “I” can see in different ways (if it’s a camera, it doesn’t use a human brain to see, for example). Other, non-generalized terms are also available, but they are not part of the abstraction group.
To create a variable to hold “table, 1”, you combine the number 1 with a generic table defined using the shape (BO) group.
A sentence where you combine words into a new word has this structure:
<word 1> <word 2>[ <word 3>[...]] DO <new word>.
This is an absolute combination. It is also possible to make relative combinations where word mixes are not saved in new words:
<word 1> <word 2>[...] FE <word(s)>[ ...].
In these relative cases, the words before an FE mark are evaluated when FE is reached. If FE is left out from such sentences, everything will be evaluated at once. Programmers might find it helpful to think of FE as a stack resetter.
When you do not use the DO or FE combiner, you state something:
<word 1>[ <word 2>[...]].
In real languages, this is the equivalent of actually expressing something — combines do not express anything, they merely aid in preparing for later expressions.
One can write “I see a table.” in two ways: the absolute way with DO or the relative way with FE.
Words for “I”, “to see”, and “table” have not yet been made, but we assume they are BIGUHA, NULASE, and GAVOTI, respectively. The integer 1 is FA BEBE B.
biguha nulase do vavo. gavoti fa bebe b do galo. vavo galo do valo. valo.
biguha nulase do vavo. gavoti fa bebe b do galo. vavo galo.
The advantage of the first variation is that VALO can be reused again and again until people have forgotten what its temporary meaning is. For example, if you are telling a story where the main character often sees a table, you could do this:
valo. valo. valo. valo. valo.
It is not necessary to define new combinations all the time. Na comes with a small built-in set of combinations which is required learning for all Na speakers. These built-in definitions should be used whenever possible, eventually in subclassed or changed forms, to make it easier to write — and especially speak — Na.
The relative way is a bit simpler, shorter and easier to say:
biguha nulase fa bebe b fe gavoti.
In fact, this relative sentence can be made into an absolute sentence:
biguha nulase fa bebe b fe gavoti do valo. valo.
In speech the relative way is much more useful than the absolute one. Both are useful, though.
Some of the groups can be used as identifiers. When an identifier is used one or more arguments are expected. The integer identifier requires one argument (the number), the real number identifier requires two arguments (before and after the point), and the letter identifier requires one argument. To use a group as an identifier, prefix it with FA.
Numbers in Na are duodecimal, i.e. base 12. The alphabet is used as numbers. A is used for zero, the consonants range from 1 to 10, and O is used for 11. When specifying a number, it should be prefixed with FA BEBA (real numbers) or any other name from a subclassed number identifier, and it should be written with the least important bit first (LSB). To pronounce a number, speak the letters of the number one by one.
TODO: Improve this strange system
This sentence is a bit tricky. We start by splitting the sentence into meaningful parts:
Again, base words have not been defined yet, so we assume that “we (generic)” (we do not know if it is an exclusive or inclusive we) is GELO, “transport” is LOLOTI, the past is BATATO, something specific is SESE, “ship” is MOLOTE, “into” is NIKO, “another” is KOBO, and “dimension” is TILE.
It appears that it is actually quite easy to create a relative sentence now:
batato gelo loloti fe sese molote niko fe fe tile kobo.
Notice the two FE in the end. Without the second FE, the sentence could also mean “We transported another dimension into the ship.”. It would not be wrong to omit the FE, but it would create an ambigious sentence (which can be useful).
Remember that the following sentence means excactly the same as the previous:
loloti batato gelo fe niko molote sese fe fe kobo tile.
Word order is only important in the case of identifiers and their arguments.
33+2.4i is a complex number. The x+yi notation doesn’t fit well in Na. Instead, the FA BEDA identifier is used (33+2.4i = 33.0+2.4i):
fa beda td a d g.
Again, this is not perfect.
Foreign words present a problem in Na.
~1000 words needed to begin with.
Since there are only 16 characters (14 letters, the period, and space), one character can be stored in only 4 bits, and 2 characters can be stored in one byte.
Because of the infinitely many relatively different ways to say the same thing, texts and speech can be varied a great deal. This could be quite useful in e.g. poems.